Published on Jaani.net (http://www.jaani.net)
Law Firms Not Liable in Alleged Web Hacking Case
Created 13.12.2005 - 15:38

'Two law firms that allegedly surreptitiously accessed an expert witness's password-protected Web site to show a judge that the witness violated a gag order cannot be held liable under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, ruled a federal judge who dismissed the suit. The occupational illness expert had accused Keller & Heckman and its attorney Douglas Behr of hacking into his site by acquiring a password and sharing it with Jones Day lawyers in the midst of a landmark toxics trial.'

Originally by Law.com Legal Technology, 2:38 PM

Read more

  • Site map
  • Terms of use
  • Disclaimer
  • Copyright
  • Privacy policy
  • Contact

Recent updates

  • endonym
    Word
  • exonym
    Word
  • autocephaly
    Word
  • Are you a:
    Binary poll
  • Bill Gates Retires Today
    Linklog
  • Robot Conducts The Detroit Symphony Orchestra
    Linklog
  • IsoHunt Goes Secure, Adds SSL Encryption
    Linklog

Recent comments

  • very intreresting.
    scaveboy
  • In the Australian vernacular
    Jaani
  • Moiré — time to get an
    Anonymous coward (not verified)
  • Retrospective
    Jaani
  • It's that time of year
    Jaani

About the author

  • Jaani Riordan
  • Age: 23
  • Location: Melbourne, Australia
  • Graduate lawyer, tutor
  • Musician, photographer
  • Technology consultant
  • Web entrepreneur

Cite as: Jaani Riordan, ‘Law Firms Not Liable in Alleged Web Hacking Case’ (2005) Jaani.net Internet Law and Technology <http://www.jaani.net/view/2005/12/13/law_firms_not_liable_in_alleged_web_hacking_case>.
Return to article