Published on Jaani.net (http://www.jaani.net)
Internet Governance Proving Controversial
Created 15.10.2005 - 19:50

'Delegates at a meeting in Geneva on Monday failed to reach an agreement on who should control the internet's addressing system. The meeting, which is being held in preparation of the World Summit on the Information Society in Tunis next month, degenerated into a farce when delegates argued over the right of the US to control the internet's addressing system.'

'The new EU proposal is based on recommendations made by the UN-sponsored Working Group on Internet Governance (WGIG) in July to establish an internet governance model that wasn't linked specifically to one country. Meanwhile, supporting the US are countries like Australia, the UK and Latin American countries such as Argentina and Chile. These countries have rejected the EU proposal with the Australian delegates warning of a "hierarchical and bureaucratic" approach to internet governance if the UN were allowed to assume responsibility for domain names and IP addresses.'

Originally by The Register - Internet and Law: eCommerce, 6:50 PM

Read more

  • Site map
  • Terms of use
  • Disclaimer
  • Copyright
  • Privacy policy
  • Contact

Recent updates

  • endonym
    Word
  • exonym
    Word
  • autocephaly
    Word
  • Are you a:
    Binary poll
  • Bill Gates Retires Today
    Linklog
  • Robot Conducts The Detroit Symphony Orchestra
    Linklog
  • IsoHunt Goes Secure, Adds SSL Encryption
    Linklog

Recent comments

  • In the Australian vernacular
    Jaani
  • Moiré — time to get an
    Anonymous coward (not verified)
  • Retrospective
    Jaani
  • It's that time of year
    Jaani
  • Yeah, I realise that the
    Jaani

About the author

  • Jaani Riordan
  • Age: 23
  • Location: Melbourne, Australia
  • Graduate lawyer, tutor
  • Musician, photographer
  • Technology consultant
  • Web entrepreneur

Cite as: Jaani Riordan, ‘Internet Governance Proving Controversial’ (2005) Jaani.net Internet Law and Technology <http://www.jaani.net/view/2005/10/15/internet_governance_proving_controversial>.
Return to article