Published on Jaani.net (http://www.jaani.net)
Accused Users Fight RIAA Summons
Created 02.09.2005 - 12:37

'First there was the mother, Patricia Santangelo, who has refused to roll-over to RIAA demands to pay their extortion fee because they claim to have identified her IP address as involved in Kazaa file sharing. Now Judge McMahon doesn't seem to be letting the RIAA have it all their way either in this case. Godwin's Law summarises the rebuke of Judge McMahon to the RIAA lawyer now that a court case has been filed. A transcript of the entire court appearance is also available', and includes such interesting exchanges as:

MS SANTANGELO: ...I no longer have that computer that ... they say the music was downloaded onto, because it had developed ... a lot of major viruses, apparently, and was wiped out and taken by my ex-husband. ... I have five children, so I wasn't real sure how [the downloading] had happened, to be honest.

THE COURT: I have some guesses.

MS SANTANGELO: I realized when I looked at [Exhibit B], the screen name that this Kazaa [user] was under doesn't belong to anyone in my family. ... Apparently, it belongs to a friend of my son, who is now 14.

...

THE COURT: -- I live in perpetual fear that something I don't know my kids are doing is going to come back and bite me in the butt. And the difference between you and me, Ms Santangelo, if it happens to me, it will be in the headlines of the New York Post.

MS SANTANGELO: That's true.

THE COURT: Right. So, anyway, you have my sympathy.

And:

THE COURT: I'm in no hurry to see this case resolved. So far, Mrs Santangelo has raised enough issues, including the use of a screen name or an account name -- not hers, but some other person's -- that suggests that she might have some really interesting defenses to this. And there are defenses that maybe even ought to be litigated. The whole concept of a young person using the parent's computer access is bad enough, but if this name is not hers, she doesn't pay for this account.

MR MASCHIO: They wouldn't have brought the action, your Honor, if they hadn't verified that very carefully.

THE COURT: Well, we'll see, won't we? We'll see.

Originally by CowboyNeal at Slashdot: Your Rights Online, 11:37 AM

Read more

  • Site map
  • Terms of use
  • Disclaimer
  • Copyright
  • Privacy policy
  • Contact

Recent updates

  • endonym
    Word
  • exonym
    Word
  • autocephaly
    Word
  • Are you a:
    Binary poll
  • Bill Gates Retires Today
    Linklog
  • Robot Conducts The Detroit Symphony Orchestra
    Linklog
  • IsoHunt Goes Secure, Adds SSL Encryption
    Linklog

Recent comments

  • very intreresting.
    scaveboy
  • In the Australian vernacular
    Jaani
  • Moiré — time to get an
    Anonymous coward (not verified)
  • Retrospective
    Jaani
  • It's that time of year
    Jaani

About the author

  • Jaani Riordan
  • Age: 23
  • Location: Melbourne, Australia
  • Graduate lawyer, tutor
  • Musician, photographer
  • Technology consultant
  • Web entrepreneur

Cite as: Jaani Riordan, ‘Accused Users Fight RIAA Summons’ (2005) Jaani.net Internet Law and Technology <http://www.jaani.net/view/2005/09/02/riaa-lawsuit-defence-arguments-transcript>.
Return to article