Published on Jaani.net (http://www.jaani.net)
Congress Can Spam, But it Definitely Can't Legislate
Created 02.02.2005 - 23:52

A year after a sweeping United States anti-spam law went into effect, there is more junk e-mail on the Internet than ever. Since the Can Spam Act went into effect in January 2004, unsolicited junk e-mail on the Internet has come to total perhaps 80 percent or more of all e-mail sent, according to most measures. That is up from 50 percent to 60 percent of all e-mail before the law went into effect.

To some antispam crusaders, the surge comes as no surprise. They had long argued that the law would make the spam problem worse by effectively giving bulk advertisers permission to send junk e-mail as long as they followed certain rules:

“Can Spam legalised spamming itself,” said Steve Linford, the founder of the Spamhaus Project, a London organisation that is one of the leading groups intent on eliminating junk e-mail. And in making spam legal, he said, the new rules also invited flouting by those intent on being outlaws.

Source: Tom Zeller Jr, New York Times

  • Site map
  • Terms of use
  • Disclaimer
  • Copyright
  • Privacy policy
  • Contact

Recent updates

  • endonym
    Word
  • exonym
    Word
  • autocephaly
    Word
  • Are you a:
    Binary poll
  • Bill Gates Retires Today
    Linklog
  • Robot Conducts The Detroit Symphony Orchestra
    Linklog
  • IsoHunt Goes Secure, Adds SSL Encryption
    Linklog

Recent comments

  • very intreresting.
    scaveboy
  • In the Australian vernacular
    Jaani
  • Moiré — time to get an
    Anonymous coward (not verified)
  • Retrospective
    Jaani
  • It's that time of year
    Jaani

About the author

  • Jaani Riordan
  • Age: 23
  • Location: Melbourne, Australia
  • Graduate lawyer, tutor
  • Musician, photographer
  • Technology consultant
  • Web entrepreneur

Cite as: Jaani Riordan, ‘Congress Can Spam, But it Definitely Can't Legislate’ (2005) Jaani.net Internet Law and Technology <http://www.jaani.net/view/2005/02/02/can-spam-act>.
Return to article