Originally by Wired News: DAT's Entertainment, 10:54 AM
The High Court in Manchester has ruled that an email cannot be recognised as a legal written offer if it does not contain a signature or name within the body of the mail. The inclusion of a user name in the message header is not enough.…
Originally by The Register - Internet and Law: Digital Rights/Digital Wrongs, 10:50 AM Read more »
In the first prosecution of its kind under the Spam Act 2003 (Cth) (‘Spam Act’), Nicholson J of the Federal Court of Australia yesterday found Clarity1 Pty Ltd and its managing director to have contravened provisions of the Act. Read more »
A company accused of using unauthorized personal data “mined” by other firms from about six million e-mail addresses across the US has agreed to reform its practices under a $1.1 million settlement. New York Attorney-General Eliot Spitzer said Datran Media used e-mail addresses and other personal data it obtained from several companies.
This somewhat alarmist article urges caution when using instant messaging ('IM') in a legal environment:
As the use of instant messaging becomes more widespread, companies must grapple with how to handle it. In some cases IM can legally be considered a document, subject to the same retention policies as other business records. Because there is a functionality that allows all IM to be preserved, a company potentially is subject to a claim of spoliation if it doesn't save all chat messages. Instant messaging is fun, casual and quick -- but it can be dangerous. Read more »
Telstra has initiated proceedings against Orion Group, a Tasmanian telemarketing corporation and reseller of wholesale telephony services. Telstra alleges that Orion has harassed its customers, transferred users to its services without permission, and misrepresented Orion’s relationship with Telstra. Read more »
koweja writes "The federal appeals court has is hearing a petition to overturn an FCC rule that extends current wire-tapping laws to cover VoIP calls. The petition comes from various privacy advocacy groups, including the Center for Democracy and Technology. Aside from the obvious privacy issues, the rule requires that providers use equipment that allows wiretaps, which would require many companies to "upgrade" in order to comply."
Originally by samzenpus at Slashdot: Your Rights Online, 9:51 PM Read more »